本期推送的是哈佛大學(xué)社會學(xué)系2019年春季課程《質(zhì)化社會分析》的課程大綱。授課教師為Michèle Lamont。 質(zhì)化方法經(jīng)常被我們提到。一方面,它看起來“酷酷的”;另一方面,很多人似乎摸不到它的線索……質(zhì)化方法是不是就是找人聊天,或者說,質(zhì)化研究真的有方法嗎? 推送這份課程大綱,初心有二。 第一,因?yàn)樗依舜蟛糠仲|(zhì)化研究的入門基礎(chǔ)文獻(xiàn)。當(dāng)然,這些文獻(xiàn)浩如煙海,可以嘗試讀讀你感興趣的部分; 第二,哪怕用手指在手機(jī)上向下劃兩下,我們也能感受到,在世界一流大學(xué)中,一門課程的閱讀量有多么大。道理直接而殘酷:不管是哪個(gè)學(xué)科,閱讀量都是硬通貨。 ① 課程目標(biāo) 一、《質(zhì)化社會分析》課程有以下四個(gè)目標(biāo): (1)為學(xué)生提供定性研究的基本訓(xùn)練。這就需要讓學(xué)生了解概念化、理論、研究設(shè)計(jì)和提問策略等問題。 (2)讓學(xué)生理解社會學(xué)定性研究中做出重大貢獻(xiàn)的領(lǐng)域。這包括對闡釋、描述和解釋性研究中使用定性方法的反思。 (3)質(zhì)性研究者與'研究對象'和'信息提供者'的接觸比其他研究人員更密切。因此,需要學(xué)生理解定性研究的倫理責(zé)任。 (4)幫助學(xué)生對學(xué)術(shù)寫作進(jìn)行整體的、批判的思考,并掌握專業(yè)的論文演示技巧,以便向同行和公眾展示他們的定性研究。 ② 課程用書 Write No Matter What: Advice for Academics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 《無論如何都要寫: 給學(xué)者的建議》 Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Jensen. Joli. 2017. Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences: Research in an Age of Info-glut. 《薩爾薩舞般的社會科學(xué): 信息過剩時(shí)代的研究》 Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Luker, Kristin. 2010. Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. 《向陌生人學(xué)習(xí): 質(zhì)性訪談研究的藝術(shù)與方法》 New York: Free Press. Weiss, Robert S. 1994. ③ 每周課程安排與閱讀材料 ??第一周 導(dǎo)論:認(rèn)識論和理論在經(jīng)驗(yàn)社會學(xué)中的作用 必讀: Sayer, Andrew. 1992. Method in Social Science (社會科學(xué)中的方法). A Realist Approach. London: Routledge. Pp. 11-46. Swedberg Richard. 2016. “Before Theory Comes Theorizing or How to Make Social Science More Interesting.” (理論化在理論之前,或如何讓社會科學(xué)更加有趣) British Journal of Sociology. 67 (1): 5-22. Cartwright, Nancy. 2007. “Are RCTs the Gold Standard?”(隨機(jī)對照試驗(yàn)是黃金標(biāo)準(zhǔn)嗎?). Bioscience 2: 11-20. 選讀: Alford, Robert. 1998. The Craft of Inquiry. New York: Oxford University Press, 1-86. Luker, Kristin. 2008. Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1-39. Isaac. Jeffrey C. 2015. “Varieties of Empiricism in Political Science.” Perspectives on Politics. 13 (4): 929-234. Elman, Colin, ed. 2012. “Symposium on Qualitative Research Methods in Political Science.” () The Journal of Politics. 70 (1): PP. 272- 292. ??第二周 學(xué)術(shù)生產(chǎn)和學(xué)術(shù)評價(jià)有哪些標(biāo)準(zhǔn)? 必讀: Abend, Gabriel. 2013. “Styles of Causal Thought: An Empirical Investigation.” (因果思維的風(fēng)格:一項(xiàng)實(shí)證調(diào)查) American Journal of Sociology. 119 (3): 602-654. Lamont, M. (2008). The Evaluation of Systematic Qualitative Research in the Social Sciences (社會科學(xué)中系統(tǒng)定性研究的評估) 141-174. Lamont, Michèle. 2009. How Professors Think (教授如何思考). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 159-201. Gerring, John. 2012. “Mere Description.” (純粹的描述) British Journal of Political Science, 42: 721- 746. 選讀: Lamont, Michèle and Patricia White. 2008. The Evaluation of Systematic Qualitative Research in the Social Sciences. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation, 23-140. National Science Foundation Sociology Program. 2004. Workshop on Scientific Foundations of Qualitative Research. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation, 9- 21, 55-58, 71-78, 121-126, and 133-136. ??第三周: 選擇問題/案例/對象和研究策略 必讀 Read a few essays from the Sociologica symposium on “How Do Sociologists Discover a Research Topic?” (社會學(xué)者如何發(fā)現(xiàn)一個(gè)研究問題?) https://sociologica./article/view/8428/8240 Luker, Kristin. 2008. Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences (薩爾薩舞般的社會科學(xué)). Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 51-75. Small, Mario Luis. 2009. “How Many Cases Do I Need: On Science and the Logic of Case Selection in Field-Based Research.” (我需要多少案例:論基于田野研究的案例選擇的科學(xué)和邏輯) Ethnography 10 (1): 5 – 38. Timmermans, Stefan and Iddo Tavory. 2014. Abductive Analysis: Theorizing Qualitative Research (溯因分析:質(zhì)化研究的理論化). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Pp. 1-66. Spillman, Lyn. 2014. “Mixed Methods and the Logic of Qualitative Inference.” (混合方法與質(zhì)化推理的邏輯) Qualitative Sociology. 37:189-205. 選讀 Emigh Rebecca Jean. 1997. “The Power of Negative Thinking: The Use of Negative Case Methodology in the Development of Sociological Theory.” Theory and Society. 26 (5): 649-684. Hannerz, Ulf, 2003. “Being There... and There... and There! Reflections on Multi-Site Ethnography.” Ethnography 4 (2): 201-216. Ragin, Charles and Howard S. Becker (eds). 1992. What is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1-15 and 121- 137. Snow, David A. Calvin Morill, and Leon Anderson. 2003. “Elaborating Analytic Ethnography.” Ethnography 4 (2): 181-200. Tope, Daniel, Lindsey Joyce Chamberlain, Martha Crowley, and Randy Hodson. 2005. “The Importance of Being There.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 34 (4): 470- 493. Wagensknecht, Susann and Jessica Pfluger. 2018. Making Cases: On the Processuality of Casing in Social Research.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie. 47(5): 289–305 Yin, Robert. 1994. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1-65. ??第四周: 民族志、田野調(diào)查和混合方法研究 必讀: Geertz, Clifford. 2001. “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture.” (深描:走向文化的解釋性理論) Pp. 55-75 in Contemporary Field Research: Perspectives and Formulations, edited by R. Emerson. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press. Emerson, Robert. 2001. Contemporary Field Research: Perspectives and Formulations 2nd Edition. (當(dāng)代田野研究:視角與規(guī)劃) Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press, 1-54. Goffman, Erving. 2001. “On Fieldwork.” (論田野工作) Pp. 153-158 in Contemporary Field Research: Perspectives and Formulation, edited by R. Emerson. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press. Lareau, Annette. 2003. “Appendix--Common Problems in Field Work: A Personal Essay,' (附錄——田野工作中的常見問題:一篇基于個(gè)體經(jīng)歷的文章) Home Advantage. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp. 187-223 Small, Mario Luis. 2011. “How To Conduct A Mixed Methods Study: Recent Trends In A Rapidly Growing Literature.” (如何進(jìn)行混合方法研究:快速增長的文獻(xiàn)及其近期趨勢) Annual Review of Sociology 37: 57-86. 選讀: Adler, Patricia A. & Peter Adler. 1998. “Observational Techniques.” Pp. 377-392 in Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, edited by Norman Denzin and Yvonna Lincoln. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing. Charmaz, Kathy, 2001. “Grounded Theory.” Pp. 335-352 in Contemporary Field Research: Perspectives and Formulations, edited by R. Emerson. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press. Doerr, Nicole and Noa Millman. 2014. “Working with Images.” Pp. 418-45 In Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research, edited by Donatella della Porta. New York: Oxford University Press. Emerson, Robert, et al. 1995. “Writing Up Fieldnotes I: From Field to Desk” and “Writing Up Fieldnotes 2: Creating Scenes on the Page.” Pp. 39-107 in Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [On reserve] Katz, Jack. 2001. “Ethnography's Warrants.” Pp. 361-382 Contemporary Field Research: Perspectives and Formulations, edited by R. Emerson. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press. Nielsen, Laura Beth. 2012. “The Need for Multi-Method Approaches in Empirical Legal Research.” in The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research, edited by Peter Cane and Herbert M Kritzer. New York: Oxford University Press. Lareau, Annette and Jeffrey Shultz, 1996. Journeys Through Ethnography. Realistic Accounts of Fieldwork. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. [On reserve] Lichterman, Paul and Isaac Reed. 2015. “Theory and Contrastive Explanation in Ethnography.” Sociological Methods and Research 44(4): 585-635. Morgan, David L. 1996. “Focus Groups.” Annual Review of Sociology 22: 129-52. Trouille David and Iddo Tavory, 2016. “Shadowing: Warrants for Intersituational Variation in Ethnography,” Sociological Methods and Research 1-27. ??第五周: 抽樣、訪談和制作訪談工具 必讀: Guests post from Ali, Syed and Philip Cohen, eds. 2016. “How to do Ethnography Right,” (如何正確地做民族志研究) Contexts https:///blog/how-to-do-ethnography-right/- Deluca, Stefanie, Susan Clampet-Lundquist and Kathryn Edin. “Want to Improve your Qualitative Research? Try Using Representative Sampling and Working in Teams” Weiss, Robert S. 1994. Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. (向陌生人學(xué)習(xí):質(zhì)性訪談研究的藝術(shù)與方法) New York: Free Press, vii-120. Luker, Kristin. 2008. Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences. (薩爾薩舞般的社會科學(xué)) Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 99-190. Rubin, Herbert and Irene Rubin. 2005. “Designing Main Questions and Probes.” (設(shè)計(jì)主要的問題和調(diào)查) Pp. 152- 72 in Qualitative Interviewing: The Art of Hearing Data (second edition). California: Sage. Lamont, Michèle, and Ann Swidler. 2014. “Methodological Pluralism and the Possibilities and Limits of Interviewing”. (方法多元主義,以及訪談的可能性與局限性) Qualitative Sociology 37 (2):153-171. 選讀: Jerolmack, Colin and Shamus Kahn. 2014. “Talk is Cheap: Ethnography and the Attitudinal Falacy.” Sociological Methods and Research 43(2): 178–209 Newman, Katherine S. 2002. “Qualitative Research on the Frontlines of Controversy.” Sociological Methods and Research 31 (2): 123-130. Biernacki, Patrick, and Dan Waldorf, 1981. “Snowball Sampling: Problems and Techniques in Chain Referral.” Sociological Methods and Research 10 (2): 141-163. Hammer, Dean and Aaron Wildavsky. 1993. “The Open-Ended, Semistructured Interview.” Pp. 57-101 in Craftways: On the Organization of Scholarly Work, edited by Aaron Wildavsky. New Brunswick, Canada: Transaction Publishers. Pugh, Alison. 2013. “What good are interviews for thinking about culture? Demystifying interpretive analysis.” American Journal of Cultural Sociology 1(1): 42-68. Watters, John K. and Patrick Biernacki, 1989. “Targeted Sampling: Options for the Study of Hidden Populations.” Social Problems 36 (4): 416-430. McClintock, Charles C., Diane Brannon and Steven Maynard-Moody. 1979. “Applying the Logic of Sample Surveys to Qualitative Case Studies: The Case Cluster Method,” Administrative Science Quarterly 24(4): 612-62. Assignment 5: Develop your interview guide based on the feedback you will have received on your blueprint and on the readings. The questions should be open-ended and intended to elicit narrative accounts pertinent to your research concern ?? 第六周: 訪談、反身性和局內(nèi)人/局外人問題 必讀: Weiss, Robert S. 1994. Learning from Strangers: The Art and Method of Qualitative Interview Studies. (向陌生人學(xué)習(xí):質(zhì)性訪談研究的藝術(shù)與方法) New York: Free Press, 121-151. Cobb, Jessica S and Kimberly Kay Hoang. 2015. “Protagonist-Driven Urban Ethnography.” (主要人物驅(qū)動的城市民族志) City and Community. 14(4):348-51. Moore, Mignon. 2018. “Challenges, Triumphs, and Praxis: Collecting Qualitative Data on Less Visible and Marginalized Populations.” (挑戰(zhàn)、勝利和實(shí)踐:如何收集隱性或邊緣化人群的定性數(shù)據(jù)) Pp 169-184 in Other, Please Specify: Queer Methods in Sociology. D. L. Compton, T. Meadow and K. Schilt. Oakland, University of California Press. Stuart, Forrest. 2018. “Reflexivity : Introspection, Positionality, and the Self as Research Instrument – Toward a Model of Abductive Reflexivity.” (反身性:作為研究工具的內(nèi)省、定位和自我——一種溯因反身性模型) In Approaches to Ethnography: Analysis and Representation in Participant Observation, edited by Colin Jerolmack and Shamus Kahn. New York: Oxford University Press. Lamont, Michèle. 2004. “A Life of Hard but Justified Choices: Interviewing Across (too) Many Divides.' (生活中艱難卻合理的選擇:跨越[太多]分歧的采訪) Pp. 162-171 in Researching Race and Racism, edited by Martin Bulmer and John Solomos. London: Routledge. 選讀: Bloor, Michael. 2001. “Techniques of Validation in Qualitative Research: A Critical Commentary.” Pp. 383-396 in Contemporary Field Research. 2nd Edition. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press. Peshkin, Alan. 1988. “In Search of Subjectivity – One’s Own.” Educational Researcher 17: 17-21. Young, Alford A. 2004. “Experiences in Ethnographic Interviewing about Race: The Inside and Outside of it.” Pp. 187-202 in Researching Race and Racism, edited by Martin Bulmer and John Solomos. London: Routledge. ??第七周: 質(zhì)的研究的倫理 必讀: Guests posts from Ali, Syed and Philip Cohen, eds. 2016. “How to do Ethnography Right,” (如何正確地做民族之研究) Contexts https:///blog/how-to-do-ethnography-right/-Fisher, Dana R. “Doing Qualitative Research as if Counsel is Hiding in the Closet.”; -Cameron, Abigail E. 2016 “The Unhappy Marriage of IRBs and Ethnography.” Humphreys, Laud. 1975. “Postscript.” Tearoom Trade. (《茶室貿(mào)易》后記) New York: Aldine de Gruyer. Pages 167-174. Fine, Gary Alan. 1993. “Ten Lies of Ethnography: Moral Dilemmas of Field Research.” (民族志的十個(gè)謊言:田野研究的道德困境) Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 22: 267-294. Van Maanen, John. 2001 1983. “The Moral Fix: On the Ethics of Field Work.” (道德定勢:關(guān)于田野工作的道德規(guī)范) Pp 269- 287 in Contemporary Field Research. 1st Edition. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press. American Sociological Association. 2017. Code of Ethics and Policies and Procedures of the ASA Committee on Professional Ethics. (美國社會學(xué)學(xué)會職業(yè)道德委員會道德規(guī)范、政策及程序) Washington, DC: ASA. http://www./sites/default/files/asa_code_of_ethics-june2018.pdf Heimer, Carol A. and JuLeigh Petty. “Bureaucratic Ethics: IRBs and the Legal Regulation of Human Subjects Research,” (《官僚倫理:IRBS與人類主體研究的法律規(guī)范》) Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6: 601-26. 選讀: Stark, Laura. 2011. Behind Closed Doors: IRBs and the Making of Ethical Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1-19. Allen, Charlotte. 1997. “Spies Like Us: When Sociologists Deceive their Subjects.” Lingua Franca (November): 1-8. Cassell, Joan. 1978. “Risks and Benefits to Subjects of Fieldwork.” The American Sociologist 13: 134-43. Shea, Christopher. 2000. “Don’t Talk to the Humans: The Crackdown on Social Science Research.” Lingua Franca (September): 27-34. ??第八周: 質(zhì)性數(shù)據(jù)分析:主題分析與編碼 必讀: Luker, Kristin. 2008. Salsa Dancing into the Social Sciences. (薩爾薩舞般的社會科學(xué)) Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 198-216. Weiss, Robert. 1994. Learning from Strangers. (向陌生人學(xué)習(xí):質(zhì)性訪談研究的藝術(shù)與方法) New York City: The Free Press, 151- 182. Saldana, Johnny M. 2015. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. (質(zhì)化研究編碼手冊) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Nicole M. Deterding and Mary C. Waters. 2018. “Flexible Coding of In-Depth Interviews; A 21st Century Approach.” (深度訪談的靈活編碼:一種21世紀(jì)的取向) Online First, Sociological Methods and Research Guetzkow, Joshua, Michèle Lamont and Grégoire Mallard. 2004. “What is Originality in the Social Sciences and the Humanities?” (社會科學(xué)與人文科學(xué)的原創(chuàng)性在哪里?) American Sociological Review 69:190-212. Consult appendix and tables only. Miles, Michael and A. Michael Huberman, 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. (定型數(shù)據(jù)分析) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 3-16, 69-104 選讀: Altheide, David L. 1987. “Ethnographic Content Analysis.” Qualitative Sociology 10: 65-77. Eliasoph, Nina. 2011. “Appendix 2: Methods of Taking Field Notes and Making Them Tell a Story.” Pp. 261-363 in Making Volunteers: Civic Life After Welfare’s End. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Emerson, Robert, Rachel Fretz, and Linda Shaw, 1995. “Processing Fieldnotes: Coding and Memoing.” Pp. 142-166 in Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. McLellan, Eleanor, Kathleen MacQueen and Judith Neidig. 2003. “Beyond the Qualitative Interview: Data Preparation and Transcription.” Field Methods 15(1): 63-84. Ryan, Gery and H. Russell Bernard. 2003. “Techniques to Identify Themes.” Field Methods 15(1): 85-109. Weston, Cynthia, et al. 2001. “Analyzing Interview Data: The Development and Evolution of a Coding System.” Qualitative Sociology 24: 381-400 and 107-120. ??第九-十周: 編碼工作坊(小組討論) ??第十一周: 寫作與評估 必讀: Joli Jensen. 2017. Write No Matter What: Advice for Academics. (無論如何都要寫:給學(xué)者的建議) Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Brunsma, David, Monica Prasad and Ezra Zuckerman. 2013. Strategies for Reviewing Manuscripts (ASA Report). (審閱手稿的策略) Albany, NY: American Sociological Association: 1-46. ASR reviewer guidelines (ASR評閱人指南): https://journals./page/asr/help/reviewer-guidelines 選讀: Becker, Howard. 1986. Writing for Social Scientists: How to Start and Finish Your Thesis, Book or Article. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [On Reserve] Erikson, Kai. 1989. “On Sociological Prose.” Yale Review 78 (1): 525-538. Kilbourn, Brent. 2006. “The Qualitative Doctoral Dissertation Proposal.” Teachers College Record 108: 529-76.Sword, Helen. 2017. Air & Light & Time & Space. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Part 4: Emotional Habits (pp. 153-194). Van Maanen, John 2011. Tales of the Field. 3rd Ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press: xiii-xx, 45-72, and 145-182. ??第十二-十三周: 學(xué)生作業(yè)展示 ④ 一份基于個(gè)人“偏見”的推薦閱讀材料 Booth, Wayne C. Gregory G. Colomb, and Joseph M. Williams, 1995. The Craft of Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Camic, Charles, Neil Gross, Michèle Lamont, eds. 2011. Social Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Elder, Glen, Elizabeth K. Pavalko, and Elizabeth H. Cliff, 1993. Working with Archival Data: Studying Lives. Newbury Park: Sage. Firestone, W.A. 1993 “Alternative Arguments for Generalizing from Data as Applied to Qualitative Research”, Educational Researcher 22(4): 16-23. Hermanowicz, Joseph C. 2013. “The Longitudinal Qualitative Interview.” Qualitative Sociology 36: 189-208. Krueger, Richard. 1988. Focus Groups. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Lieberson, Stanley. 2000. “Small N’s and Big Conclusions: An Examination of the Reasoning in Comparative Studies Based on a Small Number of Cases.” Social Forces, 70(2): 307-320. Luttrell, Wendy. 2000. “Good Enough Methods for Ethnographic Research.” Harvard Educational Review. 70 (4): 499-523. Mathison, Sandra. 1988. “Why Triangulate?” Educational Researcher 17(2): 13-17. Platt, Jennifer, 1996. A History of Sociological Research Methods in America, 1920-1960. New York: Cambridge University Press. Roth Wendy and Jal D. Mehta, 2002. “The Rashomon Effect. Combining Positivist and Interpretivist Approaches in the Analysis of Contested Events.” Sociological Methods and Research 31 (2): 131-173. Skocpol, Theda. 2003. “Doubly Engaged Social Science: The Promise of Comparative Historical Analysis. Pp. 407-429 in Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, ed. James Mahoney and Dietrich Rueschemeyer. New York: Cambridge University Press. Skocpol, Theda. 1984. “Emerging Agendas and Recurrent Strategies in Historical Sociology.” Pp. 356-391 in Vision and Method in Historical Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Suddaby, Roy. 2006. “What Grounded Theory Is Not.” Academy of Management Journal 49, 633-42 Van Maanen, John, Jesper B. S?rensen, and Terrence R. Mitchell. 2007. “The Interplay between Theory and Method.” Academy of Management Review 32, 1145-54. 回復(fù)關(guān)鍵詞 “大綱” 獲取今天的課程大綱 ??
|
|