一区二区三区日韩精品-日韩经典一区二区三区-五月激情综合丁香婷婷-欧美精品中文字幕专区

分享

【Economist】The battle in AI: Giant advantage

 Sandman_ 2017-12-20



TWO letters can add up to a lot of money. No area of technology is hotter than AI, or artificial intelligence. Venture-capital investment in AI in the first nine months of 2017 totalled $7.6bn, according to PitchBook, a data provider; that compares with full-year figures of $5.4bn in 2016. In the year to date there have been $21.3bn in AI-related M&A deals, around 26 times more than in 2015. In earnings calls public companies now mention AI far more often than “big data”.


At the heart of the frenzy are some familiar names: the likes of Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Facebook and Microsoft. A similar, though less transparent, battle is under way in China among firms like Alibaba and Baidu. Several have put AI at the centre of their strategies. All are enthusiastic acquirers of AI firms, often in order to snap up the people they employ. They see AI as a way to improve their existing services, from cloud computing to logistics, and to push into new areas, from autonomous cars to augmented reality. Many observers fear that, by cementing and extending the power of a handful of giants, AI will hurt competition. That will depend on three open questions, involving one magic ingredient.


AlphaGone


The tech giants certainly have big advantages in the battle to develop AI. They have tonnes of data, oodles of computing power and boffins aplenty—especially in China, which expects to charge ahead. Imagine a future, some warn, in which you are transported everywhere in a Waymo autonomous car (owner: Alphabet, parent of Google), pay for everything with an Android phone (developer: Google), watch YouTube (owner: Google) to relax, and search the web using—you can guess. Markets with just a handful of firms can be fiercely competitive. A world in which the same few names duke it out in several industries could still be a good one for consumers. But if people rely on one firm’s services like this, and if AI enables that firm to predict their needs and customise its offering ever more precisely, it will be burdensome to switch to a rival.


That future is still a long way off. AI programs remain narrowly focused. Moreover, the ability of the incumbents to perpetuate their advantages is made uncertain by three questions.


The most important is whether AI will always depend on vast amounts of data. Machines today are usually trained on huge datasets, from which they can recognise useful patterns such as fraudulent financial transactions. If real-world data remain essential to AI, the tech superstars are in clover. They have vast amounts of the stuff, and are gaining more as they push into fresh areas such as health care.


A competing vision of AI stresses simulations, in which machines teach themselves using synthetic data or in virtual environments. Early versions of a program developed to play Go, an Asian board game, by DeepMind, a unit of Alphabet, were trained using data from actual games; the latest was simply given the rules and started playing Go against itself. Within three days it had surpassed its predecessor, which had itself beaten the best player humanity could muster. If this approach is widely applicable, or if future AI systems can be trained using sparser amounts of data, the tech giants’ edge is blunted.


But some applications will always require data. How much of the world’s stock of it the tech giants will end up controlling is the second question. They have clout in the consumer realm, and they keep pushing into new areas, from Amazon’s interest in medicine to Microsoft’s purchase of LinkedIn, a professional-networking site. But data in the corporate realm are harder to get at, and their value is increasingly well understood. Autonomous cars will be a good test. Alphabet’s Waymo has done more real-world testing of self-driving cars than any other firm: over 4m miles (6.5m kilometres) on public roads. But established carmakers, and startups like Tesla, can generate more data from their existing fleets; other firms, like Mobileye, a driverless-tech firm owned by Intel, are also in the race.


The third question is how openly knowledge will be shared. The tech giants’ ability to recruit AI expertise from universities is helped by their willingness to publish research; Google and Facebook have opened software libraries to outside developers. But their incentives to share valuable data and algorithms are weak. Much will depend on whether regulations prise open their grip. Europe’s impending data-protection rules, for example, require firms to get explicit consent for how they use data and to make it easier for customers to transfer their information to other providers. China may try to help its firms by having negligible regulation.


The battle in AI is fiercest among the tech giants. It is too early to know how good that will be for competition, but not to anticipate the magic ingredient that will determine the outcome: the importance, accessibility and openness of data.


——

    本站是提供個(gè)人知識(shí)管理的網(wǎng)絡(luò)存儲(chǔ)空間,所有內(nèi)容均由用戶發(fā)布,不代表本站觀點(diǎn)。請(qǐng)注意甄別內(nèi)容中的聯(lián)系方式、誘導(dǎo)購(gòu)買(mǎi)等信息,謹(jǐn)防詐騙。如發(fā)現(xiàn)有害或侵權(quán)內(nèi)容,請(qǐng)點(diǎn)擊一鍵舉報(bào)。
    轉(zhuǎn)藏 分享 獻(xiàn)花(0

    0條評(píng)論

    發(fā)表

    請(qǐng)遵守用戶 評(píng)論公約

    類似文章 更多

    日韩中文字幕视频在线高清版| 婷婷色网视频在线播放| 欧美精品久久99九九| 久久精品亚洲欧美日韩| 玩弄人妻少妇一区二区桃花 | 香蕉网尹人综合在线观看| 午夜色午夜视频之日本| 亚洲国产色婷婷久久精品| 麻豆蜜桃星空传媒在线观看| 都市激情小说在线一区二区三区 | 国产又粗又长又大的视频| 久热香蕉精品视频在线播放| 欧美黄色成人真人视频| 日本办公室三级在线观看| 深夜视频在线观看免费你懂| 日本最新不卡免费一区二区| 青青操在线视频精品视频| 欧美成人免费视频午夜色| 91麻豆精品欧美视频| 亚洲性日韩精品一区二区| 亚洲中文字幕亲近伦片| 亚洲精品一区三区三区| 正在播放国产又粗又长| 久久re6热在线视频| 国产av大片一区二区三区| 日韩女优精品一区二区三区| 亚洲男女性生活免费视频| 午夜精品一区二区av| 欧美午夜国产在线观看| 国产精品免费精品一区二区| 99视频精品免费视频| 日韩成人免费性生活视频| 国产自拍欧美日韩在线观看| 日韩欧美一区二区不卡视频| 草草视频精品在线观看| 91欧美一区二区三区| 色偷偷亚洲女人天堂观看| 国产精品人妻熟女毛片av久久| 日韩精品一级一区二区| 一区二区三区四区亚洲专区| 亚洲欧美日本国产不卡|