2017年2月26日-3月3日，美國(guó)克里希那穆提基金會(huì)將首次專門為中國(guó)讀者在美國(guó)加州的克氏故居舉辦靜修對(duì)話活動(dòng)。目前冥思坊正在協(xié)助進(jìn)行招募工作，已經(jīng)有十幾位朋友進(jìn)行了預(yù)報(bào)名，并在各自辦理簽證等相關(guān)手續(xù)?；顒?dòng)名額有限，機(jī)會(huì)難得，希望有興趣的朋友盡快聯(lián)絡(luò)我們進(jìn)行預(yù)報(bào)名，如有疑問(wèn)可以隨時(shí)給冥思坊公眾號(hào)留言咨詢。了解活動(dòng)詳情及報(bào)名請(qǐng)點(diǎn)擊：【靜修招募】2017美國(guó)加州克里希那穆提故居“心靈探索之旅”

Freedom implies, does it not, that you must not follow anyone? You must be free to inquire, not accept, not look to a guide, to a system, to a saviour, to a guru. Freedom implies that you must have the capacity to inquire, not into what others say but to inquire within oneself, to investigate, to examine the whole structure of a human mind—that is, our mind, your mind. 

自由意味著你一定不能遵從任何人，不是嗎？你一定得自由地去探尋，一定不能接受，也不能指望向?qū)?、制度、救世主、古魯。自由意味著你必須有探尋的能力，不是探究他人所說(shuō)之話，而是去探尋你的內(nèi)心，去調(diào)查、去審視人類的心智——我們的心智、你的心智——其整個(gè)結(jié)構(gòu)。

Any form of conformity, imitation according to a pattern, a mold, does not allow free inquiry. And what we are going to talk about demands that you be free to listen—not only to the word but the meaning of the word, and not be a slave to the word, not accept whatever the speaker says, or deny what he says, but to listen to find out. To find out for yourself not according to some interpretation, not according to some other speaker, but to find out for yourself the truth or the falseness of what is being said.
根據(jù)一種模式、一個(gè)模子的任何形式的遵從、模仿，都會(huì)阻礙自由探尋。我們將要談的事情需要你自由地去聆聽——不僅要聆聽詞語(yǔ)還要聆聽詞語(yǔ)的意義，且不會(huì)變成詞語(yǔ)的奴隸，不接受也不拒絕說(shuō)話者所說(shuō)的任何話語(yǔ)，而是只是聆聽，然后找出答案。你自己去找出答案，而不是根據(jù)一些解釋，也不是根據(jù)其他一些講話者之見，而是你自己找出所說(shuō)之話中的真理與謬誤。

Freedom is not to do what you want to do. That is not freedom at all. And I think probably that freedom has brought about great misery in the world—each one doing exactly what he wants to do. That is rampant in this country, where there is no tradition, where there is no discipline—I am using the word discipline totally in a different sense, which we will go into presently. 
自由并非為所欲為。為所欲為根本不是自由。我認(rèn)為，或許這種自由已經(jīng)給世界帶來(lái)了巨大的不幸——每個(gè)人都做自己想做的事情。這在這個(gè)既沒有傳統(tǒng)也沒有紀(jì)律的國(guó)家很流行——我用“紀(jì)律”這個(gè)詞指的是的完全不同的意義，關(guān)于這個(gè)我們即將展開討論。

Freedom does not imply choice. One thinks one is free if you can choose. I do not know if you have ever gone into this question of choice. You have a vast array in front of you—the various teachers, yogis, philosophers, scientists, psychologists, analysts—bombarding your mind, constantly, day in and day out. And from this array you are going to choose who you think you should follow, whom you think you should listen to.
自由并非暗示著選擇。一個(gè)人認(rèn)為如果他能選擇的話，那么他就是自由的。我不知道你是否曾深入思考過(guò)選擇這個(gè)問(wèn)題。你面前有眾多選擇——各種導(dǎo)師、瑜伽修行者、哲學(xué)家、科學(xué)家、心理學(xué)家、心理分析師——持續(xù)不斷地、日復(fù)一日地對(duì)你的頭腦狂轟亂炸。你從這些選擇中挑選你認(rèn)為自己應(yīng)該遵從的人及你認(rèn)為自己應(yīng)該聆聽之人。

You choose according to your temperament, according to your desire, according to your pleasure. Please do listen to this—if you will—carefully, because you are confronted with this problem, when so many of them are telling you: 'Follow this and don't follow that' and 'Do this' and 'Do that'. And you are faced with the question of whom to listen to and who to follow, whether that teacher, that philosophy, that guru. 
你根據(jù)你的性情、你的欲望、你的愉悅?cè)ミx擇。請(qǐng)務(wù)必聆聽這個(gè)——如果你愿意的話——請(qǐng)仔細(xì)聆聽，因?yàn)槟銓⒚鎸?duì)這個(gè)問(wèn)題，也即當(dāng)他們中的許多人告訴你“遵從這個(gè)，不要遵從那個(gè)”、“這么做”和“不要那么做”的時(shí)候。你將被迫面對(duì)聽誰(shuí)的以及遵從誰(shuí)這個(gè)問(wèn)題，是遵從這位導(dǎo)師、這個(gè)哲學(xué)學(xué)派還是這位古魯。

You are not free, and it is absolutely necessary to be free to find out what is true and what is false for yourself—which no one can tell you, no system, no philosophy, no guru. When you face this array of teachers, philosophers, and systems you are forced—because you yourself are confused, life has become terrible, painful, uncertain; there is so much poverty, the threat of destruction, violence, and you want to escape from all that—you are forced to choose one of these. 
你并不自由，你自己自由地去找出什么是真理什么是謬誤絕對(duì)有必要——沒有任何人、任何體系、任何哲學(xué)、任何古魯會(huì)告訴你。當(dāng)你面對(duì)這些導(dǎo)師、哲學(xué)家和體系時(shí)，你是被迫的——因?yàn)槟阕约焊械嚼Щ?，生活已?jīng)變得糟糕、痛苦、不確定；有如此多的貧窮、毀滅之威脅、暴力，你想逃離所有這些——你被迫從中挑選一個(gè)。

And your choice is based upon your confusion, naturally, whether to follow, to listen to that teacher, to that guru, to that philosopher, so you begin to depend on yourself, thinking you are free to choose. The background of choice is invariably confusion. Aren't you confused when you choose? Aren't you uncertain when you pick one amongst all these? So your choice is essentially the outcome of confusion.

你的選擇建立在你的困惑之上，很自然的，你就會(huì)思考是否追隨、聆聽這位導(dǎo)師、這位古魯、這個(gè)哲學(xué)家，因此你開始依靠你自己，你認(rèn)為你在自由地選擇。而選擇的背景必定是困惑。當(dāng)你選擇的時(shí)候，難道你不是困惑的嗎？當(dāng)你從所有這些中選取一個(gè)的時(shí)候，你不是不確定的嗎？所以，你的選擇本質(zhì)上就是困惑的產(chǎn)物。

Reflections on the Self, ‘Freedom’
《超越孤獨(dú)》之“自由”

克里希那穆提冥思坊

微博：http://weibo.com/jkmeditationstudio